Koge vs Hvidovre IF
1st Division, Denmark · 2026-08-15 · 16:00 CET
LLLLL
LLDWWThe score model makes an Hvidovre IF win the most likely outcome at 50%, split on goals (Over 2.5 at 46%). The data's biggest gap to the market: BTTS: No — 51.0% vs 40.6% implied (+10.4 pts). Generated from the data — the market usually knows why it disagrees.
Scoreline probabilities
Priced from the same score distribution as every market below.
First goal · head-to-head
Full Market Baseline (Dixon-Coles)
One statistical model of the final score — every probability below derives from the same score distribution, so they can never contradict each other. Expected goals: Koge 0.99 – 1.54 Hvidovre IF.
| Market | Data % | Implied | Divergence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Koge win | 24.5% | 31.5% | -7.0% |
| Draw | 25.3% | 26.6% | -1.4% |
| Hvidovre IF win | 50.2% | 41.9% | +8.4% |
| Over 1.5 goals | 71.5% | — | — |
| Over 2.5 goals | 46.2% | 55.5% | -9.4% |
| Over 3.5 goals | 24.7% | 34.8% | -10.1% |
| Both teams to score | 49.0% | 59.4% | -10.4% |
| HT over 0.5 goals | 67.7% | — | — |
| HT over 1.5 goals | 29.2% | 38.0% | -8.8% |
Model dc_v2.0 · rating sample: Koge 34.6 / Hvidovre IF 31.5 weighted matches · positive divergence means the data leans above the market — the market usually knows why.
Track your pick
My record →Flat 1u, average market odds, settled either way. Not betting advice — a record, like ours.
How to read this page: probabilities are what this league's historical first-goal-time and scoring data alone imply — they know nothing about injuries, motivation or weather, and the market usually does. We publish every output, including when the data and the market agree. Statistics, not betting advice — never bet more than you can afford to lose.